With 4 million Texans shivering in the dark last night as blackouts swept the state, no media will tell you why this is happening, but we will: It is the result of more than 40 years of neoliberal policies which deregulated energy markets for speculative profits — remember Enron? — and Green policies, which are shutting down coal, oil and gas and nuclear energy production facilities, and replacing them with less efficient, less reliable, more costly systems, such as windmills and solar panels. In Texas, which now gets 23% of its electricity needs from wind generators, the turbines froze, dramatically reducing electricity supply. The Davos "Great Reset" and "Green New Deal" will greatly increase the killing, unless we stop it!
To protect a bankrupt financial system, the City of London and its allies in the Military-Industrial-Complex in the U.S. and NATO are demanding an end to sovereign governments, insisting that nations submit to their Great Reset -- which is a global central banker's dictatorship. Russia and China will not submit, putting us on a pathway to war in Ukraine and Taiwan. But such wars cannot be won, and could trigger nuclear war. The alternative was developed by Lyndon LaRouche: put the predatory financial institutions into bankruptcy, establish a New Bretton Woods financial system, and apply his Four Economic Laws to revive the American System of Physical Economy.
While some blindly believed that the United Kingdom under Prime Minister Johnson would form an alliance with the U.S. based on the shared national interests of two sovereign states, nothing could be further from the truth.
Two years ago, Lyndon LaRouche passed away, after an extraordinary life, during which he played a leading role in shaping every significant strategic battle on the planet. To commemorate that life, we are offering a LaRouche Memoriam, a 24-hour marathon of videos featuring some of LaRouche's presentations, to provide our viewers with an opportunity to benefit from the voluminous wealth of ideas he contributed.
In the last days, spaceships launched by the United Arab Emirates and China entered Mars orbit. Next week, NASA's Perseverance Mission will join them, as they will all engage in projects preparing for future missions, including landing human beings on Mars. These bold projects demonstrate what is possible when nations direct physical resources and human creativity to missions of discovery, with potentially great benefits to all mankind. In contrast, the self-proclaimed "greatest deliberative body" in the world, the U.S. Senate, is engaged in a show trial, a highly partisan exercise designed to isolate former President Trump, demonizing him and his supporters, and further polarize the nation. Better for all that we keep our focus on the stars!
With a show trial underway in the U.S. Senate, and an EU/NATO/Five Eyes planning session in Brussels, the City of London/Wall Street human rights mafia is moving aggressively to isolate and destroy Donald Trump, and to overthrow Vladimir Putin. But their real targets are not Trump and Putin, but the people of the U.S. and Russia. And what do the citizens of these nations have in common? They live in sovereign nation states which possess the political, economic and military power to not only stop the plans for a Malthusian, global banker's dictatorship, being organized by the Davos billionaires, but to establish peaceful, cooperative relationships which can lead humanity into a new era of progress.
The flames of international conflict and domestic polarization are being fanned at a moment when sober deliberation is needed, to address the interconnected crises confronting humanity. In the last days, on the eve of the Senate impeachment trial of former President Trump, representatives of the Military Industrial Complex have compared Trump supporters to ISIS and Al Qaeda members; warned that nuclear war with Russia and China is now "likely"; and are escalating Color Revolution scenarios against Russia and China. Join us this Saturday, when the Schiller Institute will sponsor a Round Table discussion at 1 PM EST, on achieving a dialogue among the great powers, with a decisive break from British-directed geopolitical provocations.
It would not be an exaggeration to identify George P. Shultz as one of those most responsible for the devolution unleashed on the physical economy of the nations of the trans-Atlantic region over the last half-century. Shultz, who died on February 6, was the quintessential "Economic Hitman," whose policies and actions paved the way for today's Davos billionaires behind the Great Reset and Green New Deal, who are carrying on his work to impose a global dictatorship run by Central bankers, on behalf of the largest private banks and financial institutions. He was not simply a typical "free market" fanatic with academic credentials, but one consciously committed to what was once called synarchism, a term used to describe the international model in which global corporations usurped the sovereign powers of nation states to drive down wages and living standards, while increasing profits for corporate shareholders.This corporatist model was employed by those who put the former "Socialist" turned "Fascist" Mussolini in power in Italy, and Hitler in Germany. The slave labor policies of the early years of the Nazis in Germany were dictated by the cartels, and imposed by Hitler's Finance Minister Hjalmar Schacht, with full support of his allies in the City of London and Wall Street. Shultz's Schachtian roots came naturally, as his father worked for the Morgan-Rockefeller-Harriman interests in New York City in the 1920s located at 120 Broadway, where stock market manipulation and the building of global industrial cartels were the order of the day. It was from these financial and corporate networks that American support was recruited by City of London operatives to participate in their "Hitler project." Shultz was trained at MIT by notorious Tavistock Institute brainwasher Kurt Lewin, whose pioneering work in lowering labor costs experimented with ways to get workers to participate willingly in their own speed-up, to avoid the more brutal methods applied by the Nazis. This work came in handy in the 1970s, when Shultz worked with the "Chicago Boys" after the bloody coup against Salvadore Allende in Chile by General Pinochet. Though he admitted in an interview that the dictator Pinochet "no doubt did some unnecessarily brutal things," he said this was needed to bring down costs to once again attract foreign investment in Chile! Before becoming a part of the U.S. support effort for the Chicago Boys in Chile, Shultz was at the center of the London-Wall Street destruction of Franklin Roosevelt's Bretton Woods system. As the dollar was being battered by demands for gold to redeem so-called Euro-dollars being dumped by British and French bankers in the late 1960s, Shultz, then a member of the economic team of the Nixon administration, joined with Paul Volcker, Arthur Burns and Henry Kissinger, to convince Nixon to break with Bretton Woods, ending the gold reserve system backing the dollar, and initiating the era of floating exchange rates. This act, done on August 15, 1971, was denounced by Lyndon LaRouche at the time, who accurately described it as modelled on the policies of Schacht. This was the final blow to the post-war economic boom launched by President Kennedy, with his FDR-oriented commitment to government-directed investment in physical goods production, with an emphasis on scientific and technological progress. Instead, since then, the physical economy of the U.S. has been on a downward trajectory, in which money flows have been directed to speculation on increasingly risky-but-profitable financial instruments, creating ever-new bubbles, in an escalating wealth transfer to the wealthiest 1%. Shultz was an ardent supporter in the Reagan administration of the Thatcherite deregulation policies, which freed bankers from concern with the physical economy. In 1999, he organized a group of neoliberal War Hawks called the Vulcans to back George W. Bush, whose wars benefited his Military Industrial Complex confederates, including leading contractor Bechtel, on whose Board he served. He joined with Lord Jacob Rothschild to make Arnold Schwarzenegger Governor of California, after the free market energy policies he championed bankrupted the state. And with synarchist banker Felix Rohatyn he pushed the "Revolution in Military Affairs", designed to further privatize military and security operations coherent with the new surveillance state set up by the Bush-Cheney Patriot Act. Among his last ventures was his work with fellow Bush-League operative James Baker in support of a carbon-tax scam, in keeping with his anti-industrial Green proclivities. Shultz's death no doubt will be mourned by those aggressively pushing the fascist Great Reset, which he did so much to advance during his life.
George Shultz was a leading economic hitman, a prominent promoter of Schachtian economic policies, named for Hjalmar Schacht, who was responsible for Nazi's slave labor policy. Shultz was at the center of more than fifty years of the "controlled disintegration" of the U.S. economy: advising Nixon to break with the gold-reserve system in 1971; advocating Thatcherite deregulation under Reagan, which led to the boom-bust economy ever since then; organizing establishment support for the Bush-Cheney regime, with its "endless wars" and surveillance state; and promoting the "revolution in military affairs," to privatize national security, placing it under a global corporatist umbrella. For much of what is now being aggressively pushed by the Davos crowd -- the Great Reset and the Green New Deal -- Shultz served as one of the key architects.
Say what you will about Donald Trump's foreign and military policy, that it was unpredictable, full of contradictions, and relied on the liberal use of sanctions, when threats and bluster against purported adversaries did not get the desired results -- but he did not begin new wars, nor did he expand those bequeathed to him by his immediate predecessors, George W. Bush and Barack Obama. And despite bellicose rhetoric from neocons and War Hawks in his administration, such as John Bolton, Defense Secretary Esper and Secretary of State Pompeo, the reaction by Trump was generally restrained, even when presented with false flag operations, such as claims of the use of chemical weapons by Syria against opponents of the Assad government, pushed by British-based White Helmets terrorist supporters, or false reports from "anonymous sources" of "Russian bounties" being paid to Taliban militants for each American soldier they killed. (1.) Until the end of his presidency, he insisted that he wished for a relationship of peaceful cooperation with Russian President Putin; and until he was panicked by the spread of the COVID pandemic in the U.S. to blame China for the disease in March 2020, he still referred to President Xi of China as his "friend", and was pursuing a second phase to the trade deal he had brokered with Xi, which was completed in December 2019. It was through collaboration with Putin and the Russian military in Syria that the "Islamic Caliphate" was toppled, and work with both Putin and Xi led to dramatic progress with North Korea -- until it was sabotaged by Bolton's threats to Kim Jong-un, which derailed the Trump-Kim summit in Hanoi on February 27-8, 2019. His efforts to withdraw U.S. troops from Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria repeatedly were opposed by Congress, in league with military leaders committed to continuing the phony "war on terror" of previous administrations.While the results of his presidency thus fell far short of the full break with the imperial geopolitical approach of Bush and Obama which he promised during his campaign in 2016, the failure to strengthen the relations with Russia and China, and to fully end the "endless wars", could reasonably be attributed to the damage done by the incessant lies of Russiagate and the Ukraine impeachment. These fabricated narratives undermined his ability to engage in serious diplomacy, and forced him to rely on the legions of the permanent bureaucracy burrowed inside the intelligence community and the Departments of State, Defense and Justice, whose loyalty was not to him, but to the "Military Industrial Complex." This dependence on the bad actors who served in previous administrations was reinforced by War Hawks in both parties in Congress, who opposed his efforts to withdraw from the wars, and by a corrupt, lying media, which attributed his willingness to work with Putin to paying off a debt to the Russian President for orchestrating his election. As we reported from the beginning of his administration, the purpose of Russiagate was precisely to sabotage agreements with Russia and China, and to keep Trump, and the U.S., trapped in a paradigm defined by British geopolitical strategy, with the U.S. providing the military and economic muscle to sustain the Empire centered in the City of London and Wall Street. Unfortunately, neither he nor his closest allies ever fully exposed the British role in collaboration with Bush and Obama intelligence and security operatives in running Russiagate and the ongoing "Color Revolution" against him, a failure which ultimately assured that a decisive break with British geopolitics and neoliberal economic/financial policy would not occur.ENTER JOE BIDENThe line from the anti-Trump networks among political leaders, the diplomatic corps and media, is that the Biden presidency represents a return of "adults to the room", after the disruption done by Trump to the strategic alliances forged by Bush and Obama. Left unsaid is that these alliances led to costly and destructive wars continuously, beginning with an invasion by U.S. and allied troops under "Operation Enduring Freedom" on October 7, 2001. While "freedom" has been elusive for the people of Afghanistan, the war there remains "enduring."On February 4, Biden delivered a much-anticipated address to State Department diplomats, in which he promised a return to the provocative policies toward Russia and China of the Obama administration. He expressed his intent that, in contrast to Trump, his administration will "begin re-forming the habits of cooperation and rebuilding the muscles of democratic alliances that have atrophied from four years of neglect." He continued in this vein: "American leadership must meet this new moment of advancing authoritarianism, including the growing determination of China to rival the United States, and the determination of Russia to damage our democracy." He added that under his direction, the U.S. will "reclaim the mantel" of global leadership.This conforms with the pronouncement of his newly-installed Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, Victoria Nuland, that America faces an "existential...challenge from the rising autocrats," accusing Russia and China of "acting to deepen their hooks not only into our alliance system but into changing the global rules of the world." In assuming the number three position at State, Nuland will build on the anti-Russian provocations she ran during the Obama-Biden years, when she oversaw the regime change coup in Ukraine, that toppled the Yanukovych government, spearheaded by a combination of Soros' funded "human rights" groups, and anti-Russian Nazi militia units of the Azov Battalion. Future Russiagate figure and former MI6 operative Christopher Steele aided their efforts, filing a series of situation reports from Ukraine delivered to Secretary of State John Kerry. Biden served as Obama's "point-man" on Ukraine. Nuland is a long-time adherent of the neocon doctrine of American unilateralism, from the time she served as Deputy National Security Adviser to the war criminal Dick Cheney, when he was Bush's Vice-President.Ironically, the reassertion of muscular unilateralism is being portrayed by Biden allies as a return to "multilateralism." British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has called for a "Council of Democracies" to "Save Multilateralism." Johnson proposed a "D-10", i.e., a "Democratic 10", which would add British Commonwealth members Australia and India, along with South Korea, to the G-7. Biden likewise said he would convene a "global democracy summit" to "counter the rise of authoritarian states," which he claims were encouraged by Trump's "authoritarian populism," according to the {New York Times}. A leading advocate of the D-10 is former Obama-Biden State Department official Ash Jain, who was a leader of the "43 Alumni for Joe Biden", a PAC of former Obama officials backing Biden's presidential campaign. Jain now directs the Atlantic Council's "D-10 Strategy Group", which released a paper on Dec. 23, 2020, "Countering China's Challenge to the free world". He and his collaborators write that the "CCP's (Chinese Communist Party's) repressive model and reliance on nationalism diminish opportunities for cooperation in a rules-based system." Jain described the D-10 in an interview with London's {Economist} magazine as a "small number of strategically like-minded and highly capable states," working together "to advance the liberal world order." For these War Hawks, a "rules-based system" of the "liberal world order" allows for propagating lies to invade and destroy sovereign states, as was done by the Obama-Biden administration to Libya, and arm and train the Islamic Jihadists of ISIS and Al Qaeda to carry out regime change in Syria.The Atlantic Council, which was notorious for its promotion of the Russiagate narrative against Trump, released a new report in January, which spells out the intent to contain China in a replay of the launching of the Cold War against the Soviet Union, directed by the British in 1946-7. The 85-page report, titled "The Longer Telegram: Toward a New American China Policy," provides marching orders for the military encirclement of China. (2.)This report, attributed to "anonymous", insists on a pre-war deployment against China in greater depth than Jain's earlier report, and was released with much fanfare by the Atlantic Council's chairman, Frederick Kempe. The dangerous implications of this strategy were laid out in an op-ed by Admiral Charles Richard, the head of the U.S. Strategic Command. Richard argues that the U.S. must engage in a crash modernization program of its nuclear forces, lest it fall behind China and Russia. He described the current trajectory as one headed toward a "likely thermonuclear war."BIDEN'S WAR HAWKSThe team assembled to serve the Biden administration is made up of a number of officials who worked previously in the Obama-Biden administration, and demonstrated their commitment to geopolitical confrontation with Russia and China. Biden himself has a long history as a unilateralist War Hawk, defending the Bush-Cheney wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and Obama's provocative approach to Russia over Ukraine and Syria. In his first discussion with Putin, while reaching a final agreement on the extension of the START nuclear arms agreement -- which is good, but was largely prepared under Trump -- he lectured the Russian President on the treatment of the U.S.-British backed "dissident" Navalny, and blamed Russia for hacking in the Solar Winds case, which is yet another example of unproven allegations. His spokesman Jen Psaki bragged to the press that Biden showed Putin that the days of pandering by Trump to authoritarian governments are over, and Biden himself boasted in his State Department address that his foreign policy actions thus far show that "America is back"!Prominent members of his team include: Antony Blinken, former Deputy Secretary of State under Obama, who is notorious for his call for bombing Syria in defense of "moderate rebels". In his Senate confirmation hearing, he described the Russian-German Nord Stream 2 pipeline as "a bad idea," promising that he would "determine what we can do to prevent" its completion. He said he is "deeply disturbed by the violent crackdown against supporters of Navalny" and favors imposing new sanctions as punishment. He also called for a "tough stance" against alleged Russian military actions in Ukraine. Jake Sullivan, the National Security Adviser, served in the same position under then-Vice President Biden. He has also demanded a strong response to alleged Russian and Chinese "aggression". Avril Haines, Director of National Intelligence, drafted documents to provide "legal justification" for the Obama-John Brennan launching of drone strikes in the middle eastern wars. Defense Department documents show that a disproportionate number of those killed in these strikes were civilians, including women and children. General (retired) Lloyd Austin, the Secretary of Defense, went from active duty into a position on the Board of leading military contractor Raytheon. In his confirmation hearing, he emphasized that he will "focus" on the threat posed by China, articulating classic British geopolitical reasoning to defend this: "China presents the most significant threat because China is ascending. Russia is also a threat, but it is in decline. It can still do a lot of damage...." Susan Rice — though she has been appointed the head of the Domestic Policy Council, Rice is a dedicated War Hawk whose lineage goes back to those who promoted British geopolitics, as implemented by Zbigniew Brzezinski. Rice's mentor, Madeleine Albright, was a product of Brzezinski's school of geopolitics. In addition to her advocacy for continuing the "endless wars", she played a leading role in coordinating the emerging Russiagate strategy against the Trump administration, through her participation in the January 5, 2017 meeting at the White House, which reaffirmed the administration's policy to prosecute Trump's designated National Security Adviser, General Michael Flynn. Samantha Power — Obama's U.N. Secretary, who has been a leading promoter of the "Responsibility to Protect" doctrine, which has been used repeatedly to justify regime change operations, will head the Agency for International Development (AID), giving her the ability to use funds directly to conduct future Color Revolution operations. It should be noted that the policies endorsed by Biden's team are virtually identical to those pursued by Trump's Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo!FOOTNOTES: 1.) The most notable exception to a policy of restraint was the lamentable strike which killed Iran's Revolutionary Guard leader Qasem Soleimani and Iraqi militia Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis. This was an act carried out based on still-classified intelligence that they were preparing an imminent strike on American soldiers in Iraq. Trump "took credit" for the decision to carry out the assassination, though it is clear that the initiative to do it came from Pompeo and his team, cheered on by their former colleague Bolton. 2.) The title refers to the "Long Telegram", a memo written in February 1946 by George Kennan to the State Department. Kennan, who was working in the U.S. Embassy in Moscow, proposed a policy of "containment" against the USSR, which was coherent with that pushed by Britain's Winston Churchill. This application of anti-Russian British geopolitics resulted in the prolonged Cold War between the U.S. and Russia, in direct opposition to Franklin Roosevelt's post-war intentions, and defined strategic policy as a battle between the two blocs, which lasted until the fall of the USSR in December 1991.
In a world of constant threats and life-and-death challenges, real intelligence is of paramount importance. Our job is to provide that to you, so you can become part of the mobilization to present solutions to the crises we face. Today's questions deal with whether we are headed for war with Russia and China; what is behind the military coup in Myanmar, which overthrew one-time human rights favorite Aun Suu Kyii; what is corporate fascism; and what do you think is behind today's "cancel culture"? For more on these and other questions, be sure to watch my dialogue from yesterday with Helga Zepp LaRouche, posted at The LaRouche Organization and the Schiller Institute.
The choice, as one proponent of convicting Donald Trump argues, is "between the U.S. as we know it or the white supremacist mob." The author of this incendiary absurdity is an anti-Trump columnist for the Guardian newspaper of London, which has served as a relentless mouthpiece for the City of London forces behind the coup run against Trump. Why the desperation today, when he's already out of office? With their financial system heading toward an epic meltdown, the City and its U.S. allies are trying to ram through a global banker's dictatorship — the "Great Reset" — to put in place a bigger, "Green" Ponzi scheme, before the present one crashes. Don't submit to these murderous thieves, join us to put their corrupt neoliberal system into bankruptcy, and on trial for financial fraud.
American patriots would be well advised to heed Lyndon LaRouche's admonition to "Know Your Enemy". The forces behind the four-year regime change effort against President Trump are escalating their efforts to topple the governments of Putin in Russia and Xi in China.
Whatever happened to the plea for unity? With impeachment, censorship and rancor undermining any prospect for a constructive dialogue to address the collapse of the economy and financial system, the Biden team seems to be hoping it can forge a unity among the War Hawks in both parties, for regime change and war with Russia and China.
Ignore the chatter that the GameStop stock battle is over whether to "democratize" trading, and let the "little guy get a piece of the action." The real story, which will never be reported, is that the financial system is bankrupt, and a "full-fledged epic bubble" is about to pop, according to Jeremy Grantham.
By Harley Schlanger Jan. 29 -- For those globalist oligarchs who spent four years obsessively focused on removing Donald Trump from the Presidency, the January 20 inauguration of Joe Biden should have been a moment of immense relief. While Trump was prevented from carrying out his plans for a full, decisive break with the strategic orientation of George W. Bush and Barack Obama, largely due to the fabricated Russiagate narrative, he repeatedly interfered with their plans, and his "unpredictability" made him a constant threat to inflict more damage. His intent to collaborate closely with Putin and Russia represented a danger to the designs of the British-led imperial forces, to keep the world divided along classic geopolitical lines, while his withdrawal of the U.S. from the Paris Climate Accord and the Trans-Pacific Partnership free trade agreement -- a central feature of Obama's anti-China "Asia Pivot" -- disrupted years'-long plans for eliminating the ability of sovereign nations to exert control over their economic and trade policies. Yet, after removing Trump from his role as Commander-in-Chief, the anti-Trump forces continued to move aggressively to destroy him and the movement, which produced seventy-five million votes for him in the 2020 election.Sign up to the LaRouche Organization Using the pretext of the storming of the Capitol on January 6, he was impeached a second time, without even a preliminary investigation of what actually occurred, which would have shown that intelligence and security agencies -- such as the CIA and FBI -- likely had a hand in provoking the deadly events of that day. Further, a heavy-handed escalation of the "surveillance state" is underway, which includes calls for more aggressive monitoring of "right-wing" groups, through passing a new, more extensive "Patriot Act"; censorship of social media platforms by the Big Tech accomplices of the "Military Industrial Complex"; and the designation of Trump supporters as "violent thugs" and "terrorists." At the same time, troops remain stationed in Washington, allegedly to protect the Capitol from those accused of preparing a violent assault during the coming impeachment trial in the U.S. Senate. In the background is the continuous drone of QAnon-related voices, with their insistent claims that Biden is not the President, that the military has been empowered by Trump to impose martial law by secretly invoking the Insurrection Act, and that Biden, Hillary Clinton and thousands of others will be arrested and tried before military tribunals, in preparation for his return, in March or April. The Q "interpreters" are calling on Trump's supporters to continue to "Trust the Plan" -- which provides the anti-Trump forces with a justification for an ongoing demonization of his supporters, and a pretext for a more militant crackdown against them. To step back for a moment, the whole situation bears an eerie resemblance to a Hollywood script, with the United States being turned into a Banana Republic, in which those who fabricated Russia-gate and the Ukraine impeachment fiascos are portrayed as the guardians of democracy, protecting the nation against fascist mobs, justifying the use of the tools of a dictatorship to protect a fragile republic. It should lead a sensible citizen to ask, "Why the overkill? What is really going on here?" The Davos Agenda The answer begins with the intent of those financial, corporate and intelligence networks behind Biden to rapidly push ahead the genocidal "Green Agenda", which had been delayed by the Trump presidency. Within hours after his inauguration, Biden enacted measures and issued numerous Executive Orders which reversed Trump policies, which had been taken to prevent the further deterioration of the nation into a post-industrial rubbish heap. Biden reinstated the U.S. in the anti-growth Paris Climate Accord, cancelled the Keystone XL Pipeline project, signed several other Executive Orders coherent with a Green policy, and signaled his support to Congressional allies to proceed with the anti-growth "Green New Deal", based on the premise that advances in efficient industrial and agricultural production are the cause of climate change. The global component of this was an online conference of the World Economic Forum (WEF) of the Davos billionaires, from January 25 to 29, in which corporate leaders from around the world were joined by leading heads of state, to proclaim allegiance to a shift to a "sustainable" energy future. Presented as an emergency policy to prevent devastating climate disasters, based on the false claims that CO2 emissions threaten human survival, the impetus behind this is a fifty-plus year campaign by neo-Malthusians to reduce the world's population, using the fraudulent claim that there are "too many" people engaged in a struggle over "too few" resources. Typical of this is the assertion of leading Malthusian Prince Charles, that "Humanity...has caused immense destruction to the planet that sustains us." The problem facing the Davos crowd is that, despite years of Fake Science propaganda blaming human beings for the destruction of Mother Nature -- the line pushed by the British monarchy, under the leadership of Prince Philip and Prince Charles, and now with the support of leading financial and corporate CEOs -- many nations are resisting the demands to transform their economies, through the imposition of killer austerity policies and deindustrialization. The devastating effects of the COVID pandemic, which was initially seen as creating an impetus to enable a "Just Transition" out of fossil-fuel and nuclear technologies into "sustainable" sources, has created concern for the WEF's Klaus Schwab, who expressed his fears that nation's will reassert their authority to direct resources to fight the pandemic, instead of submitting to "global governance." To counter this potential reassertion of the use of sovereignty to defend lives, the Davos cabal, under the direction of Prince Charles, Schwab, former Bank of England Governor Mark Carney, Sir Michael Bloomberg, and BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, has organized an extensive network of CEOs of leading private financial and other corporate cartels, to agree to a top-down policy of cutting credit to businesses and enterprises with a "carbon footprint," while using the credit-generating power of central banks to produce a flood of liquidity to finance the shift to a "green" economy. While bragging about the opportunity created by committing $30 trillion in capital funds for this transformation, it has not escaped notice that only .8% of these funds are being offered to nations in Asia and Eurasia, as these nations remain committed to improving infrastructure, particularly in energy production, transportation and chemistry (for example, fertilizer production), to improve the lives of their citizens, which is unacceptable in the dystopian future concocted by the Davos oligarchs. Opposition Emerges Among Sovereign States Resistance to the Davos reset was evident in addresses by China's President Xi Jinping and Russian President Putin, both of whom warned that growing economic inequality is a greater danger to humanity than the threats invented by the Fake Science behind climate change. In his speech, Xi, while stating that China is taking aggressive measures to combat pollution, insisted that the present crisis calls for advances in science and technology, especially in infrastructure development in the former colonial nations, in which he included modern health care systems as a priority, given the threat from the pandemic. China is addressing its future energy needs not by returning to feudal "sustainable" systems, such as inefficient wind and solar technologies, but by building clean coal plants and nuclear power plants, including nuclear fusion, which are scheduled to provide nearly 100% of China's power needs in the near future. To meet the needs of growing populations in the developing sector, he insisted that a multilateral approach is required, meaning that the attempt to use funding to blackmail poor nations into accepting the unilateral approach of austerity through the "sustainable future" demanded by Davos, is unacceptable. Putin was more explicit in his warning that there is a danger of war if there is no commitment to real economic development, of the type rejected by Davos. "There is a chance," he said, "that we will face a formidable breakdown in global development, which will be fraught with a war of all against all and attempts to deal with contradictions through the appointment of internal and external enemies and the destruction of not only traditional values...but fundamental freedoms." Elaborating on this latter point, he explicitly denounced measures employed by "Big Tech" to suppress free speech and free press in some countries -- an obvious reference to censorship in the U.S. -- while allowing the same platforms to be used for regime change in other countries, as in the backing for Navalny's opposition forces in Russia. He also denounced the great transfer of wealth to 1% of the population, an obvious reference to the financial policies in the TransAtlantic region, where virtually free money is provided by central banks to speculators, who prosper from the resulting speculative bubbles, while imposing crushing debt on the real economy and poverty on the vast majority of the population. Given what Xi and Putin presented, as a defense of governments pursuing the sovereign interests of their nations through multilateral dialogue, it is no surprise that those behind Davos are providing funding and logistical support for regime change operations against them, to defend their utopian plans for a world order dominated by global corporatist interests. Whither the United States? It is those same corporate interests which were behind the ouster of Donald Trump, and the drive to crush his movement. That a strong, sovereign U.S., committed to the scientific and technological development explicit in Trump's commitment to a Kennedy-style space program and a robust return to a future based on nuclear energy, could join in a cooperative alliance with Russia and China, is the source of fear, which led his enemies to the fraudulent measures employed to crush that potential. It is an alliance of four powers -- the U.S., Russia, China and India -- as proposed by American economist and statesman Lyndon LaRouche, which is necessary to realize that potential, and which can mobilize the economic and military power to defeat the modern British Empire, which include the City of London, Wall Street and Silicon Valley, the leading forces behind the Davos "Great Reset". This raises the question in the minds of the Malthusian oligarchs if Biden will be able to extinguish the desire for economic growth which was sparked by Trump's moves in that direction. It is unlikely that Americans will embrace a further reduction in living standards, resulting from the Davos demands for a "sustainable future", as most Americans still retain an optimistic sense that the key to future prosperity is to be found in advances in science and technology applied to physical production, and will reject austerity for the sake of enriching those already wallowing in wealth, if there is an alternative visible. To provide leadership to that innate set of beliefs, the LaRouche movement is producing a White Paper which exposes the intent of the Davos oligarchs in their desire to reduce the world's population. The paper will be published by the Executive Intelligence Review and the Schiller Institute, complete with charts and graphs to demonstrate the deadly effects of reducing the energy-flux density of power production worldwide, along with a review of the history of the Malthusians and their commitment to population reduction. Lyndon LaRouche devoted fifty years to organizing opposition to the efforts of the British empire to stifle economic development and reverse scientific advance. As a result of his emergence as a leader in this fight globally, in which he combined exposure of these nefarious, anti-human operations, with dozens of specific plans for regional and multi-continental development projects, he was targeted by the same forces which later ran the regime change operations against President Trump, and was slandered and eventually unjustly imprisoned. This new report complements an earlier report published by the LaRouche movement, "The LaRouche Plan to Reopen the U.S. Economy: The World Needs 1.5 Billion New, Productive Jobs." In combination with the new report, those in the U.S. committed to restoring the productive power of the U.S. economy will possess the blueprint which can enable them to join forces with leaders of other sovereign nation states, to crush the genocidal intentions of the Davos establishment, and facilitate a shift into a New Paradigm, in which a multilateral effort to achieve the Common Aims of Mankind defeats those impelled by their Satanic impulses to commit mass murder to defend their bankrupt and collapsing world order.
Friday Questions -- Don't believe everything you hear. The cabal which ran Russiagate thinks it won, but it is a Pyrrhic victory, which will be overturned not by a secret plan organized by "good guys" in the military and intelligence, but by a mobilization of the American people. Questions include, Do you think Trump is still the President?
The stream of propaganda from supporters of the global banker's dictatorship being shaped at Davos, which claims that they have won, and that resistance is futile, is FALSE.
The conversation yesterday between Russian President Putin and Joe Biden had one positive outcome, an agreement to extend the START Treaty, set to expire next week, for five years. However, Biden's lecture to Putin about a series of alleged "malign actions" by Russia reflects a return to the provocative policies of the Bush and Obama administrations, which put the U.S. on a course toward war with Russia. Instead, since both nations face a common enemy, i.e., the globalists of Davos who are moving to impose a global banker's dictatorship called the "Great Reset", the proper approach to relations between the two superpowers would be to take up LaRouche's proposal for a Four Power agreement, to establish a New Bretton Woods system and crush the City of London and its Wall Street allies.
EIR and the Schiller Institute will soon release a report with a devastating exposure of the genocidal intent of the "Great Reset" and the "Green New Deal".
With the inauguration of Joe Biden, the power of the U.S. Presidency has been put at the service of those demanding a centralization of power in the hands of private central bankers, to push through a genocidal "Green New Deal."
Jan. 22, 2021 — Surrounded by tens of thousands of troops and a sparse crowd, the inauguration of Joe Biden as President of the United States had little in common with the usual celebratory mood which surrounds the peaceful transfer of power in the American republic. It bore instead a distinct resemblance to the installation of a regime which seized power in a coup in a banana republic — which, in fact, is what happened! With a majority of Republicans convinced that the election was stolen from Donald Trump, and angry that neither courts nor legislatures seriously investigated the charges of fraud, many view Biden as an “illegitimate” president. The Inauguration occurred two weeks after a deadly riot overwhelmed security forces at the U.S. Capitol, on January 6, which disrupted efforts by Trump supporters in the Congress who were engaged in a fully legal, Constitutional process of challenging the certification of Electors for Biden, due to evidence of voting irregularities. It occurred one week after the House of Representatives impeached President Trump for a second time, accusing him of inciting the “insurrection” which led to the storming of the Capitol, in a rush to judgement in a highly charged environment. Perhaps given the turmoil and uncertainty caused by these events, it is not surprising that President Biden emphasized a call for “unity … unity for a divided nation” in his inaugural address. Yet this call had a decidedly hollow ring to it, as Biden and his supporters, instead of promoting policies which can foster unity, are moving to criminalize any opposition to what he was installed to do as President, going so far as to label Trump supporters as “racists” and even “terrorists.” This is hardly a language which would facilitate unity and reconciliation!Obviously uninterested in acting in a manner which would promote unity, the cabal behind the four-year effort to overturn the election of Trump in 2016, and which rigged the 2020 election for Biden, is acting to increase the polarization in the nation. In their minds, they have finally succeeded in removing Trump — and now they are going for scorched earth destruction of Trump and his supporters. Trump himself, in addition to facing an impeachment trial in the Senate, has been threatened with the prospect of numerous civil and criminal charges against him, his family and his businesses in the courts. Leading Democrats and intelligence/security officials are gearing up for an assault against him and the seventy-five million Americans who voted for him. Hillary Clinton, for example, still bitter over her 2016 loss to Trump, called for a “9/11-style Commission” to investigate the riot on January 6, focused not on the pre-planning that went into it — which would show that, rather than an incitement by Trump, security officials were aware well in advance that plans had been made for an attack, and did nothing to prepare for it — but revisiting the lies of Russiagate, decrying Trump as one who “disdains democracy” and remains under the control of Putin! She was joined on her podcast by House Speaker Pelosi, who agreed to establish such a commission, and reminded listeners proudly that she had once confronted Trump by telling him, “With you, Mr. President, all roads lead to Putin.” Both described the riot as “a gift to Putin.” Simultaneously, such vitriol was reinforced by unhinged drone murderer and former CIA chief John Brennan, in his description of the Trump movement as an “unholy alliance … of religious extremists, authoritarians, fascists, bigots, racists, nativists, even libertarians.” Brennan played a leading role against Trump in fabricating the debunked narrative of Russiagate, and has yet to be prosecuted for the damage to the nation resulting from his lies. Also chiming in is the Center for American Progress (CAP), a Democratic think tank, which claims that the coalition built by Trump “could become a full-fledged insurgency that poses a significant and enduring threat to all Americans.” CAP’s statement calls for deploying the “full use of existing tools and authorities” to combat it. One of those tools which is supported by the Democrats is social media censorship, which has even been imposed against the accounts that President Trump had successfully employed, to combat the mainstream media lies and slanders against him. CNN went so far as to feature a “cult expert” who asserted that Trump supporters are part of a “cult", and they must be “deprogrammed." A Strategy For True Unity Those who long for “unity” should revisit the efforts of Abraham Lincoln, who famously intervened against the toxic polarization which had been stoked for years against the American republic by British imperial interests, in his speech of June 16, 1858, accepting his party’s nomination for U.S. Senator. Known for its most prominent line, “A House Divided Against Itself Cannot Stand,” Lincoln understood that the division of the Union into half-slave, half-free “cannot endure permanently.” This address was a prescient warning, delivered less than two years before his election as President, and nearly three years prior to the beginning of the bloody civil war, which began shortly after he was inaugurated. The deeper issue addressed by Lincoln in this speech and in his presidency, was the battle between two completely irreconcilable systems: the American System, as forged by the Founding Fathers after their successful War of Independence against the British Empire, and the British System of “free trade.” Slavery was imposed by the British system, which intended to preserve a quasi-colonial status for America, as an agrarian society of planter aristocrats, using slave labor to produce cheap cotton for British textile mills. The southern aristocrats, backed by London, were allied with New York bankers and Boston’s merchant trading class, both of which retained close ties to their former colonial masters. The Constitution of the Confederate States of America endorsed slavery and state rights, favoring a weak central government with little power. The Confederacy was seen by influential British Foreign Minister Lord Palmerston as the best way to weaken the United States, presaging a reincorporation of at least part of the country into the Empire. Lincoln’s revival of the American System was crucial not only for a victory in the Civil War, but in the development of post-war America as the strongest industrial economy in the world. His commitment to building the Transcontinental railroad became a driver for not only westward expansion, but in unifying the nation. This was furthered by the adoption of Hamiltonian credit policies and the use of tariffs to protect America’s fledgling industries. This application of the American system allowed for the advance of modern industry, especially in developing the steel and engineering capabilities required for the production of machine tools, which boosted the productivity of labor both in manufacturing and agricultural production, which over time led to the development of higher living standards for working people. By decisively defeating the attempts by the British and their U.S. allies to divide the U.S., Lincoln intended to unite the people around a national mission to develop the continent, with far-reaching effects internationally. This succeeded, despite his assassination by a network directed from London, through restoring the American System model created by Alexander Hamilton and his allies among the Foundin Fathers. This model, revived by Lincoln and advisers such as Henry Carey and E. Peshine Smith, was adopted by many other nations after 1876, including Bismarck’s Germany, France, Russia and Japan. This advance in America, when copied in such plans as Count Witte’s Trans-Siberian railroad for Russia and Eurasia, and the proposed Berlin to Baghdad line, was seen as an existential threat by the British Empire, which depended on its military control of the seas, and imposition of free trade to dominate the world economy. Equally galling to the London-based financial empire was Lincoln’s alliance with Tsar Alexander II of Russia, who deployed ships of the Russian navy to prevent a blockade of northern ports by the British fleet, a repeat of Russia’s support for the American colonies, through its role in the League of Armed Neutrality, during the War of Independence against the British. The roots of Russiagate, the desperate effort to prevent Trump from collaboration with Putin and Russia, can be seen in the Empire’s fear historically of such an alliance. What the Empire intends for a Biden administration is to return to the endless war policies of the Bush and Obama-Biden administrations, and imposing a global central banker’s dictatorship, called the “Great Reset,” in support of a genocidal Green New Deal. To succeed in doing this requires crushing the Trump movement in the U.S., using the kind of gang-countergang tactics historically applied by the Empire to crush their opponents, which means increasing the polarization. National Mission For Global Development The attempt by President Trump to define a global strategy for a sovereign U.S., free from the endless regional wars fought on behalf of global neoliberal and geopolitical interests, is what made him a target of the City of London, and its allies in the U.S. “Military Industrial Complex.” It is the policies of the interlocking directorates of global cartels, which in addition to inciting “endless” wars, impose the forced underdevelopment of the former colonial world, with the neoliberal austerity and free trade policies which have reduced living standards in the trans-Atlantic region, to maintain their power, which is needed to protect their collapsing, bankrupt system through genocidal looting. This is what has driven the polarization which today increases geopolitical tensions. Add to that the deliberate fostering of “identity politics” inside nations, which mirrors the geopolitical divide-and-conquer strategy applied in international policies, which pits smaller groups against each other in a fight for a shrinking pie, and you have a formula for a Hobbesian world of each against all. A compelling argument to counter this polarization was presented by Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her weekly dialogue on January 21. Asked to comment of Biden’s hypocritical call for “unity", she offered some good advice for him: Noting that he is a Catholic, she said, “...he should read the Encyclical of Pope Paul VI that he wrote in 1967, which was called Populorum Progressio, or On the Development of Peoples, and in which he said that the ‘the new name for peace is development.’ And in the same way, one can say that the ‘new name for unity is development.’ The only way one can hope to have unity inside the United States would be to put on the agenda an economic program which would give productive jobs to every American, which would undo the economic injustices which are, after all, the reason why Trump was elected in 2016, and why all the Trump voters are still sticking to Trump. So, if he wants to have unity, he should make development the new name for unity, and internationally it would go in the same direction.” While it appears unlikely that, as presently constituted, the Biden administration would heed the founder of the Schiller Institute’s sage advice, she noted that the strategic, social, economic and political crises confronting it require a change in direction. To succeed in avoiding a global systemic economic/financial collapse, and more wars, she advocated adopting Lyndon LaRouche’s Four Power agreement to establish a New Bretton Woods, and implementing his Four Economic Laws, which are derived from applying the American System of the Founding Fathers and Lincoln. A sovereign U.S. would find common cause with the sovereign nations of Russia, China and India, which in alliance would be able to forge an economic and military power to defeat the British Empire and its fifth column in the U.S. and the European Union. Further, she believes that a significant segment of the Trump movement would support a shift in this direction, as Trump’s campaign in 2016 incorporated elements of LaRouche’s approach, including a return to Glass Steagall banking separation, infrastructure investment and fostering scientific and technological advance at the frontiers of science — echoing his Four Laws — and cooperation with Russia and China. While the combined effects of Russiagate, the COVID pandemic, and opposition from anti-Trump layers in the Republican Party, who joined with their fellow War Hawks and neoliberals in the Democratic Party against him, sabotaged the potential of the Trump administration, the Trump base remained loyal to the President, and could be mobilized again to back the principles of the American System. If committing the citizens of the U.S. to a unified national mission is truly the goal, then Zepp-LaRouche’s strategy, based on returning to the principles of the American System, must be deployed to defeat the British Empire and its lackeys in America.
What happened to QAnon? What do you think of Joe Biden's call for "unity" (what a hypocrite!)? What is our post-election strategy? Why did Trump not pardon Julian Assange? How can we develop an emotional connection to Reason?
When Abraham Lincoln stated in June 1858 that "A House divided against itself cannot stand", he was identifying the efforts of supporters of the British System, among southern planters and Boston-New York financial interests, to divide the U.S. More than 160 years later, we are again caught in a battle between those War Hawks and neoliberals, who would divide us around phony, narrow interpretations of "self-interest", versus those committed to a national mission based on the American System.
Those committed to removing Donald Trump from office have applied the tactics of regime change "Color Revolutions" for the last four years, with an agenda of removing any opposition to their plans for a global banker's dictatorship called "The Great Reset."
